International Relations - Wight, Bull & Chiaruzzi
🇬🇧
In English
In English
Practice Known Questions
Stay up to date with your due questions
Complete 5 questions to enable practice
Exams
Exam: Test your skills
Test your skills in exam mode
Learn New Questions
Manual Mode [BETA]
The course owner has not enabled manual mode
Specific modes
Learn with flashcards
Complete the sentence
Listening & SpellingSpelling: Type what you hear
multiple choiceMultiple choice mode
SpeakingAnswer with voice
Speaking & ListeningPractice pronunciation
TypingTyping only mode
International Relations - Wight, Bull & Chiaruzzi - Leaderboard
International Relations - Wight, Bull & Chiaruzzi - Details
Levels:
Questions:
83 questions
🇬🇧 | 🇬🇧 |
For Realists, in any Balance of Power has what? | Those powers satisfied with the status quo and others that are dissatisfied |
Approach to IR: Revolutionists | Ethical and prescriptive terms |
Approach to IR: Rationalists | Teleological terms |
Approach to IR: Realists | Sociological terms |
Perception of Int. Society: Realists | States are not engaged in simple struggle, but limited in their conflicts with one another by common rules and institutions |
What are the Three traditions? | Realist, Rationalist, Revolutionist |
Who are the three traditions named after? | Hobbes & Machiavelli, Grotius, Kant |
Description of International Politics for: Realists | International anarchy |
Description of International Politics for: Rationalists | International intercourse |
Description of International Politics for: Revolutionists | About relations among human beings within the states |
Main element stressed: Realists | International Anarchy |
Main element stressed: Rationalists | International intercourse |
Main element stressed: Revolutionists | Community of mankind |
Means to strive for peaceful international change: Realists | Role of brute force |
Means to strive for peaceful international change: Rationalists | Priority of order over justice |
Means to strive for peaceful international change: Revolutionists | Priority of justice over order |
What Revolutionists think international society ought to be | A universal state |
What is Hobbesian state of nature analogy? | Everyone anticipating/prepping for war |
What does Balance of Power reaffirm for Revolutionists? | The authority of satiated powers |
What is foundation of existence of world politics? | Common interest in the existence of interstate rules and institutions |
What kind of institutions does Bull consider | Long-term Primary Institutions |
What counts as the long-term primary institutions | Fundamental set of practices and customs for the realisation and maintenance of international order |
"Anarchical society": What does this capture? | Fundamental Political organisation of relations among states and other political units in world politics |
Problem with 'Individual Justice' | No genuine protection of human rights, only selective protection dependent on states objectives |
Order is what | A generally enchanced value |
What do demands for justice involve? | States, individuals and whole humanity |
What are the concepts of "cosmopolitian justice"? | Revolutionary |
Name one of the long-term primary institutions | Balance of Power |
Only principle that is compatible with maintenance of current fundamental concept of human political organisation. | International Justice |
What did Third World Countries look to as a key to the protection they needed from Western hegemony | Sovereignty of the State |
What makes a State System? | Interaction between states sufficient enough to make the behaviour of each a necessary element in the calculations of the other. |
What makes an International Society? | Group of states that are bound by a common set of rules with their relations to one another. |
Europe and Ottoman Empire: System or Society | State System |
Europe and the Americas: System or Society | State System |
What can happen once an international society takes place? | Rules and Institutions could be exported to states in the system belonging to other cultures |
What are the UN and League of Nations associated with? | Process of making rules for international conduct |
In Bull's terms, why would the UN and League of Nations be considered eligible for International Society title? | General membership involved the activities Bull listed as grounds for International Society |
Why is the definition of International Society problematic for the League of Nations? | 4 Superpowers were not not included at one point |
What an International Society is conscious of. | Certain common interests and common values |
What happens in a State System? | States are in regular contact with one another |
There is a these that modern state-systems are the result of what? | Specifically Western or European experience |
"Just as domestic politics influence is not government, international politics influence is not ..." | Power |
The word Nation is interchangable with what words? | State or Power |
How does a Power become a Great Power? | A successful war against another Great Power |
What is a Nationality? | People with consciousness of historic identity expressed in distinct language |
What does Nation mean in Asia & Africa? | Political unit asserting its right of independent statehood against European domination |
What makes Power? | Size of population |
In the case of Terrorist Groups, a state can be considered what? | Political community |
Give an example of a terrorist group who have become a 'state'? | ISIS - Islamic State* |
Terrorist groups 'divenire players nella scacchiera internazionale', and this allows what? | Relativi vantaggi |
Terrorist Groups are considered what? | Non-State Actors |
Military and Armed Forces can possibly secure what? | A states own security |
War threatens what? | International community |
Renunciation of war is a what? | Political tool |
Collective security references what? | Last century between 2 World Wars |
For Pacism, how do they reject the idea that war is inevitable? | History is not forever, resolving conflicts between individuals can change it |
For Pacism, they reject war. Why? | Pacism rejects violence, therefore rejecting distinction between just and unjust war |
Military somewhat goes hand-in-hand with what? | Security dilemma |
Through the constant threat of military or 'armed power' and history, it can be considered that there is a ...? | Continuation of war |
What can the military pose as in IR? | Decisive datum |
Despite not being used actively, what can military or armed forces do? | Generate threat and increase supposed power |
IR started with analysing the state of war and how it came to be. Why is this? | Every theory is used to try prevent another war and recognise it |
What is the cause of generating war? | No World Government |
What can you use armed forces to do? | Threaten other armed forces |
The nature of Int. Law | Anarchic |
International Law is the principle of what? | Non-interference in the internal affairs of states in this sense and its limited |
What brings considerable misunderstandings to International Law? | Domestic analogy |
International Law is not equal to ... | Concepts of Justice |
What can be considered the Heart of International Law? | Idea that humanity is divided into states & commits a principle of order |
Why is International Law anarchic? | Rules that Int. Court give cannot be imposed by any world government |
How can International Law expose the Balance of Powers between states? | Shared states impose the law, some may have a greater impact/say than others |