SEARCH
🇬🇧
MEM
O
RY
.COM
4.37.48
Guest
Log In
Â
Homepage
0
0
0
0
0
Create Course
Courses
Last Played
Dashboard
Notifications
Classrooms
Folders
Exams
Custom Exams
Help
Leaderboard
Shop
Awards
Forum
Friends
Subjects
Dark mode
User ID: 999999
Version: 4.37.48
www.memory.co.uk
You are in browse mode. You must login to use
MEM
O
RY
  Log in to start
Index
 »Â
Engineering Ethics
 »Â
Chapter 1
 »Â
Pt. 1 - Tort
level: Pt. 1 - Tort
Questions and Answers List
level questions: Pt. 1 - Tort
Question
Answer
Honest Mistake May Defy Negligence
Ramsay and Penno v. The King, 1952
Product Liability
Donoghue v. Stevenson, 1932
One Party Relies on Special Skills of 2nd party and 2nd party knows, 2nd part duty bound to take reasonable care
Hedley Byrne v. Heller, 1963
Disclaimer Absolves 3rd Party if Disclaimer is clear
Wolverine Tube v. Normanda, 1994
Engineers have duty that extends to 3rd party if failure creates dangerous effects
Winnipeg Condominium v. Bird Construction, 1995
Engineer has duty to note deficiency
Conama Contracting v. Huffman, 1983
When Disclaimer involved, test is if disclaimer is clear and reasonable
Micron v. Hong Kong Bank
Employer also held responsible
Dutton v. Bognor Regis United Building, 1972
Concurrent Tortfeasors - both architect and engineer responsible
Corp Dist. Of Surrey v. Carrol - Hatch, 1972
Can be liable for both tort and contract
Central Trust v. Rafuse, 1986
Manufacturer must provide proper labeling and instruction
Lem v. Barotto Sports & Ponsness - Warren, 1976
Instructions must be reasonable and provide level of detail not known to consumer
Lambert v. Lastoplex Chemical 1971